Server down again
- {DOU}Cygnus
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:20 pm
- Location: Wherever I am.
- Contact:
Server down again
Looks like it's been down most of the day.
- .:Isabella:.
- Posts: 2889
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:58 am
Re: Server down
.
.
.
sorry...
I do not know why I left a smile ...
probably, last night's champagne....
- {DOU}Cygnus
- Posts: 4146
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 6:20 pm
- Location: Wherever I am.
- Contact:
Re: Server down again
Just went down again during a JB map.
-
- Posts: 4388
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:15 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Server down again
Might be time to go shopping for a new provider.
Draco was going to shut down because his server costs were becoming too much when he got a deal through C-ops Canny for about $35 a month. This included an upgrade to a quad core processor.
mAmA
Draco was going to shut down because his server costs were becoming too much when he got a deal through C-ops Canny for about $35 a month. This included an upgrade to a quad core processor.
mAmA
Re: Server down again
Nah, Canny and I each had a dual core box. To save on costs, I terminated my server and then we upgraded his to a{DOU} yO mAmA wrote:Might be time to go shopping for a new provider.
Draco was going to shut down because his server costs were becoming too much when he got a deal through C-ops Canny for about $35 a month. This included an upgrade to a quad core processor.
mAmA
quadcore with more memory and IP's and then we split the cost. Turned out to be much cheaper on a machine that
can pull our servers without issue.
The problem you guys have with your servers going down is that the restart script fails to work in Linux, whereas the
Windows box we use actually has a functioning restart script. Our servers go down a few times a day from one error or
another but the script brings the server back up in 15 seconds. Fix the startup script issue and that problem will go
away. Have a good one.
~Johnny Jones
- {DOU}The Jargonaut
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:25 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Server down again
Buy a Mac server
-
- Posts: 4388
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:15 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Server down again
Well....., I remembered half of it rightDraco wrote:Nah, Canny and I each had a dual core box. To save on costs, I terminated my server and then we upgraded his to a{DOU} yO mAmA wrote:Might be time to go shopping for a new provider.
Draco was going to shut down because his server costs were becoming too much when he got a deal through C-ops Canny for about $35 a month. This included an upgrade to a quad core processor.
mAmA
quadcore with more memory and IP's and then we split the cost. Turned out to be much cheaper on a machine that
can pull our servers without issue.
The problem you guys have with your servers going down is that the restart script fails to work in Linux, whereas the
Windows box we use actually has a functioning restart script. Our servers go down a few times a day from one error or
another but the script brings the server back up in 15 seconds. Fix the startup script issue and that problem will go
away. Have a good one.
~Johnny Jones
mAmA
- .::/3I§ON::.
- Posts: 5562
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 7:46 pm
- Location: The MidWest's "BlackSheep" of {DOU}
- Contact:
Re: Server down again
Your half was more than I even knew about
{DOU}.::/3I§ON::.
"Did you hear the one about me trying to die?
Fist in the air and a finger to the sky.
Do I care if you hate me? Do you wanna know the truth?
C'est la vie... adiós... good riddance... fuck you!..."5FDP"
Fist in the air and a finger to the sky.
Do I care if you hate me? Do you wanna know the truth?
C'est la vie... adiós... good riddance... fuck you!..."5FDP"
Re: Server down again
Nope. The restart script we have works great, it's been like half a year since the sniper server has been down for more than a minute. The problem is that the script is not currently being used with the UT2k4 server. I just never got around to it and won't until after I re-vamp that server. My workload [at work] is a lot lighter now so I find that I have a bit more energy during my off-hours, thus I have begun to get things done.
Qwazywabbit re-coded for us a package originally made for Quake II so that it now works for the UT games. It calls the server every x amount of time and waits for a response. If it doesn't get a response it jumps into action and first makes sure there isn't a hanging process, if so it kills it. Then it restarts the server. It works flawlessly. It will very soon be used for all of our running processes (that need to be monitored).
Windoze blows. If there is a Mac or Linux solution go with that. There always is.
T
Qwazywabbit re-coded for us a package originally made for Quake II so that it now works for the UT games. It calls the server every x amount of time and waits for a response. If it doesn't get a response it jumps into action and first makes sure there isn't a hanging process, if so it kills it. Then it restarts the server. It works flawlessly. It will very soon be used for all of our running processes (that need to be monitored).
Windoze blows. If there is a Mac or Linux solution go with that. There always is.
T
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:15 am
- Location: Southern California, USA
Re: Server down again
I have one each, Linux, Windows, iMac (OS X 10.4) and the stability of the operating systems are pretty much equal with a strong edge in favor of Linux because it is designed as multiuser system with a graphical "shell" for the console. My problem with Linux is that there are so many flavors there is no one "Linux". They also come out with a new patch or new major release at a higher rate than Windows so your only hope of "stability" is to stay way back from the bleeding edge. Unlike Windows, once there is a major release in Linux all development stops on the older ones so bug fixes or backlevel patches are non-existant unless you go into the sources and fix it yourself. As desktops they are equal with a slight disadvantage (IMO) in OS X due to the fact you can't grab a window border on a Mac and resize the window in one dimension at a time, you always have to grab the lower right corner, which just sucks when you are used to border drags in Windows and Linux. It would have been nice to have the option.
The one thing I like about OS X is that setting a dialog item has immediate effect, you don't have to click "apply" or OK to make it happen so you can do and undo a setting in two clicks.
As for scripting, there are scads of languages in all of them (OS X is derived from FreeBSD), so you have a wide choice no matter which platform you choose and many are portable, so for example Perl can be used on all three if you add the perl system to Windows.
The one thing I like about OS X is that setting a dialog item has immediate effect, you don't have to click "apply" or OK to make it happen so you can do and undo a setting in two clicks.
As for scripting, there are scads of languages in all of them (OS X is derived from FreeBSD), so you have a wide choice no matter which platform you choose and many are portable, so for example Perl can be used on all three if you add the perl system to Windows.
Re: Server down again
Well, which would you prefer? Windows Server 2003....Tommy wrote:
Windoze blows. If there is a Mac or Linux solution go with that. There always is.
T
or this? Linux/Mac Server...
~Johnny Jones
-
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:15 am
- Location: Southern California, USA
Re: Server down again
So, one should buy a $70 program on top of a $300 OS for a nice GUI interface to functionality that comes free on Linux? In Windows, RunAs, servany and SCM can be used to create, monitor and restart a service on failure just as easily, all for free.
Re: Server down again
...and us old school users actually prefer the console.
T
T
Re: Server down again
The FireDaemon I got free through them. The box itself, we scored a huge deal on and ended up paying about $40 a month less than other providers supply so we actually came out about $15 ahead had we gone with another providerQwazyWabbit wrote:So, one should buy a $70 program on top of a $300 OS for a nice GUI interface to functionality that comes free on Linux? In Windows, RunAs, servany and SCM can be used to create, monitor and restart a service on failure just as easily, all for free.
using Linux. In the end it was a great situation without having to spend a week teaching others how to use Linux. And
it's as stable as Linux only it has to be rebooted about every ten days.
~Johnny Jones