PLEASE READ THIS EVERYONE

HappyFnCamper wrote:
Kinda funny that I have one of the best pings listed (1/2 the ping of posts) at the thread and get the same as Moon, poor in game results... Moon might even get less lag then I do lol. From Fn France at that!!! FromFnFrance (that would make a cool nic) lol.

I would have love it !!! LOL

HappyFnCamper wrote:
.:cHiCkEn/:. did ya go in the edit tab of pingploter and copy to text (clipboard) and just paste to post on thread... if so it shoulda given a summary at the end also.. unless maybe you didn't let it finish the trace for the settings you got it set on now and ya copied it before it could sum.

I think that Chicken is using the old Pingplotter version that didn't give the last informations. I know because I had that version just before doing those last tests and it wasn't giving the IP and packets and average ping indications...

HappyFnCamper wrote:
.:cHiCkEn/:. did ya go in the edit tab of pingploter and copy to text (clipboard) and just paste to post on thread... if so it shoulda given a summary at the end also.. unless maybe you didn't let it finish the trace for the settings you got it set on now and ya copied it before it could sum.

Moon wrote:
I think that Chicken is using the old Pingplotter version that didn't give the last informations. I know because I had that version just before doing those last tests and it wasn't giving the IP and packets and average ping indications...

Yeah, I think Moon is right. I let it finish the trace and waited a long time after it was done thinking maybe it took a while to tally up for some reason. And yeah, I used the "edit - copy text" method. I only saw the one free version when I d/l it, but I'll go look for an update or newer one.

"{DOU}.:cHiCkEn/ wrote: [quote=HappyFnCamper]
.:cHiCkEn/:. did ya go in the edit tab of pingploter and copy to text (clipboard) and just paste to post on thread... if so it shoulda given a summary at the end also.. unless maybe you didn't let it finish the trace for the settings you got it set on now and ya copied it before it could sum.

Moon wrote:
I think that Chicken is using the old Pingplotter version that didn't give the last informations. I know because I had that version just before doing those last tests and it wasn't giving the IP and packets and average ping indications...

Yeah, I think Moon is right. I let it finish the trace and waited a long time after it was done thinking maybe it took a while to tally up for some reason. And yeah, I used the "edit - copy text" method. I only saw the one free version when I d/l it, but I'll go look for an update or newer one.

Yes Chicken, you'd better use the link Tommy has put in the first post of this thread.

Moon wrote: [quote="{DOU}.:cHiCkEn/][quote=HappyFnCamper]
.:cHiCkEn/:. did ya go in the edit tab of pingploter and copy to text (clipboard) and just paste to post on thread... if so it shoulda given a summary at the end also.. unless maybe you didn't let it finish the trace for the settings you got it set on now and ya copied it before it could sum.

Moon wrote:
I think that Chicken is using the old Pingplotter version that didn't give the last informations. I know because I had that version just before doing those last tests and it wasn't giving the IP and packets and average ping indications...

Yeah, I think Moon is right. I let it finish the trace and waited a long time after it was done thinking maybe it took a while to tally up for some reason. And yeah, I used the "edit - copy text" method. I only saw the one free version when I d/l it, but I'll go look for an update or newer one.

Yes Chicken, you'd better use the link Tommy has put in the first post of this thread.

Yeah, I downloaded the FREE PingPlotter Freeware v1.10 from Tommy's link. Is everyone else using the 30 day trial of the PingPlotter Standard V2.60? Maybe that's it.

I used the standard one and just opened it. I did not save it.

Target Name: N/A

IP: 65.99.206.30

Date/Time: 1/15/2006 12:07:40 PM

1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms [192.168.0.1]

2 23 ms 11 ms 12 ms 10 ms 36 ms [10.184.224.1]

3 10 ms 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms [68.87.212.169]

4 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms 11 ms 10 ms [68.87.212.17]

5 12 ms 12 ms 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms [68.87.212.9]

6 13 ms 13 ms 16 ms 15 ms 14 ms [12.117.240.9]

7 15 ms 15 ms 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms tbr1011001.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.82.74]

8 13 ms 13 ms 16 ms 15 ms 13 ms [12.122.81.101]

9 17 ms 17 ms 16 ms 130 ms 14 ms p5-0.core01.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.11.237]

10 15 ms 19 ms 18 ms 40 ms 16 ms p5-0.core02.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.134]

11 53 ms 55 ms 164 ms 116 ms 50 ms p4-0.core01.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.210]

12 63 ms 59 ms 59 ms 74 ms 60 ms p5-0.core02.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.37]

13 60 ms 60 ms 61 ms 60 ms 60 ms g0-2.na21.b010621-0.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.250.10.170]

14 60 ms 60 ms 74 ms 62 ms 60 ms colo4dallas.demarc.cogentco.com [38.112.28.42]

15 63 ms 67 ms 66 ms 67 ms 62 ms [207.210.234.26]

16 64 ms 68 ms 68 ms 61 ms 94 ms [65.99.206.30]

Ping statistics for 65.99.206.30

Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0.0%)

Round Trip Times: Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 94ms, Average = 71ms

Also of interest is the packet loss that reported on p4-0.core01.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.4.210].

Both it and p5-0.core01.sjc03.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.11.237] also had huge jitter.