I’ve set this poll up so we can all speak with one voice when it comes to obeying the rules on our server.
If the Mod will be deleted: we will still have a no close kill rule (kill from a distance) and the question will remain how close is close. The problem of backing-up to kill will be gone.
If the Mod stays:
Backing-up to get a kill is always against the rules.
The range of the NoCloseKill mod should be doubled or even trippled.
I voted the first option.
But mod distance should be trippled.
Back to kill forbidden.
I would like that in this poll, there are no anonymous voters. The votes done without explanation should be annulled, since this is an important point, which can go so far as to break the clan.
{DOU}.R_Mad wrote: I voted the first option.
But mod distance should be trippled.
Back to kill forbidden.
Same here! The mod should stay, just modified....
When the mod is tripled....backing up will be less of an issue.
I agree with R_mad, set the mod so all kills are legal with no doubt
Keep the mod, lengthen the distance, it takes away any guess work/ interpetation of the rules.
Yeah, i popped into the Soccer Field map for less than a minute and I was close killed by two new players. Both kills could have been avoided by lengthening the mod distance.
No longer fun to play....
{DOU}.R_Mad wrote:
I would like that in this poll, there are no anonymous voters. The votes done without explanation should be annulled, since this is an important point, which can go so far as to break the clan.
I dont have a real problem with anonymous voters, eventhough I do like to know why someone voted for a certain option. A breakpoint for the clan? Dont see that coming, but time will tell.
_________________
Be aware, and this goes for all, that the first option on the votelist means also that you agree with the close kills that are done just out of the range of the mod as it is set at this moment (so all kills out of range of the mod are legal). We all seem to be in favourite of extending the range, but it could take a while for Tommy to change the distance.
This poll isn't set up to prove right or wrong, but to gain consensus on the subject.
I voted second option. I play on our server often enough to say that close kill mod is a problem for few players only and few noobs. Majority of players can understand the rule of close kill and they also can play fair.
Increasing the distance of the mod can make problems on small maps.
Voted for the second option.
Same arguments as Rad.
I voted to triple the distance, backing out of the zone to kill is a no-no.
The current interpretation of this rule by players and admins alike has been nothing but trouble. Change it or kill it altogether.
Voted Option 1
Voted option 2. But even if we make the mod farther out there will still be peeps who back out and kill you.
{DOU}Charger wrote: Voted option 2. But even if we make the mod farther out there will still be peeps who back out and kill you.
But those peeps will be much much further away and not right behind me like they are now. I just want them to be outside of my hiding spot....most rooms should be safe once the mod is tripled.
kitty wrote: [quote={DOU}Charger]Voted option 2. But even if we make the mod farther out there will still be peeps who back out and kill you.
But those peeps will be much much further away and not right behind me like they are now. I just want them to be outside of my hiding spot....most rooms should be safe once the mod is tripled.
agree
It seems that all 10 active DOU members have voted.....lol
Latest Post: IRC How-To Our newest member: Wrotkaw Recent Posts Unread Posts
