... /23SU/2/23CT3|) from the server around 4 CT? Was told that the server was a Camping/deemer server and if he/she didnt like it they could leave and then lo and behold the ip was banned? Who did this and why?
Guilty !
Don't feel sorry about him Bison.
http://clandou.com/html/index.php?option=com_jfusion&Itemid=36&jfile=viewtopic.php&f=20&t=8405
FYI.
I Kick/banned his IP temporary to get him kicked.
Just a kick doesn't work on the RSA. IP ban is allready deleted again.
So you kicked him/her because he/she said:
Pretty sad when you get to use deemers on a CAMPING sever...
Thats it ❓ REALLY ❓ Wasn't breaking any other rules ❓ wow...
NATAN wrote:
Just a kick doesn't work on the RSA. IP ban is allready deleted again.
I know, I deleted it.
".::/3I§ON wrote: [quote=NATAN]
Just a kick doesn't work on the RSA. IP ban is allready deleted again.
I know, I deleted it.
If you wouldn't had I would've done it myself thx.
".::/3I§ON wrote:
Thats it ❓ REALLY ❓ Wasn't breaking any other rules ❓ wow...
There's really nothing 'wow' to it.
He's complaining almost everytime when he comes to play on the server, so it must be seen in a bigger perspecive. He's free to search for a 'better' server which might be more suitable for him.
I'm sure there are others who feel the same way about him. If you would had a bit more patient you would have seen this thread coming up before you felt you needed to ask for it on this thread.
He/she did NOT break any rules. NONE whatsoever. Compained about deemers, thats it. NOTHING more. I'm sure NUKER here, will jump on your side too but in reality? What was done for the kick?
Nothing
Your going to kick people because they dont like deemers now? Better add that to the rules. (WHINING ABOUT DEEMERS IS A KICKABLE OFFENCE).
NATAN wrote: I'm sure there are others who feel the same way about him.
I know NUKER here, does. I've seen the RSA. He rides his/her ass to no end about it. Even if he/she says nothing.
Whether I will be mischievous, if I say:
Our simpatico and impassive admin boiled up and kicked that annoying player
P.S.
I played many times against /23SU/2/23CT3|). He is a good camper on his few favourite maps - usually wins on those maps, then picks another one of his favourites or else goes out of the server. Usually he is silent during the game and doesn't talk about anything. He comes to shoot, not to play - that is getting boring. 😕
Rad wrote: Whether I will be mischievous, if I say:
Our simpatico and impassive admin boiled up and kicked that annoying player
![]()
P.S.
I played many times against /23SU/2/23CT3|). He is a good camper on his few favourite maps - usually wins on those maps, then picks another one of his favourites or else goes out of the server. Usually he is silent during the game and doesn't talk about anything. He comes to shoot, not to play - that is getting boring. 😕
Good camper but dislikes deemers = kick/ban
".::/3I§ON wrote: He/she did NOT break any rules. NONE whatsoever. Compained about deemers, thats it. NOTHING more. I'm sure NUKER here, will jump on your side too but in reality? What was done for the kick?
Nothing
Your going to kick people because they dont like deemers now? Better add that to the rules. (WHINING ABOUT DEEMERS IS A KICKABLE OFFENCE).
NATAN wrote: He's complaining almost everytime when he comes to play on the server, so it must be seen in a bigger perspecive.
Ofcourse it's not in the rules. Its just anoying when someone is constantly whining about the server.
Whining about deemers, Elevator camping when it doesn't ocur. Same thing on teleporter camping, shooting in the back etc. etc.
As an Admin I am responsible for my actions. I dont take actions just because I can kick someone. If you are questioning my actions, thats fine.
I have no problems with that. I stand fully behind the action I took in this matter.
Rad wrote: Whether I will be mischievous, if I say:
Our simpatico and impassive admin boiled up and kicked that annoying player
![]()
P.S.
I played many times against /23SU/2/23CT3|). He is a good camper on his few favourite maps - usually wins on those maps, then picks another one of his favourites or else goes out of the server. Usually he is silent during the game and doesn't talk about anything. He comes to shoot, not to play - that is getting boring. 😕
I know he is a good camper and doesn't break the rules. I have no problems with his gameplay. It's as it should be.
It's the constant whining that is gonna bother me after a while.
The message I've sent him was very clear: If you don't like it on our server, search for another one that completely suits your needs.
".::/3I§ON wrote:
Good camper but dislikes deemers = kick/ban
Are you really that narrow minded 3ison?
Guess I must have held you for more intelligent all that time.
Didn't kick/ban his IP.
I've allready explained that, but if you just want to read what you want to read.....
NATAN wrote: [quote=".::/3I§ON]
Good camper but dislikes deemers = kick/ban
Are you really that narrow minded 3ison?
Guess I must have held you for more intelligent all that time.
Didn't kick/ban his IP.
I've allready explained that, but if you just want to read what you want to read.....
You did kick/ban the ip it was in there, I REMOVED IT
".::/3I§ON wrote: [quote=NATAN][quote=".::/3I§ON]
Good camper but dislikes deemers = kick/ban
Are you really that narrow minded 3ison?
Guess I must have held you for more intelligent all that time.
Didn't kick/ban his IP.
I've allready explained that, but if you just want to read what you want to read.....
You did kick/ban the ip it was in there, I REMOVED IT
Allready explained about the IP.
Sure you removed it.
You removed it before I could delete the temporary ban on the IP again.
You just interfered with my action as admin on that part. Would have been solved if you had shown some patients in this case, but now its just my word agains yours I guess.
NATAN wrote: [quote=".::/3I§ON]He/she did NOT break any rules. NONE whatsoever. Compained about deemers, thats it. NOTHING more. I'm sure NUKER here, will jump on your side too but in reality? What was done for the kick?
Nothing
Your going to kick people because they dont like deemers now? Better add that to the rules. (WHINING ABOUT DEEMERS IS A KICKABLE OFFENCE).
NATAN wrote: He's complaining almost everytime when he comes to play on the server, so it must be seen in a bigger perspecive.
Ofcourse it's not in the rules. Its just anoying when someone is constantly whining about the server.
Whining about deemers, Elevator camping when it doesn't ocur. Same thing on teleporter camping, shooting in the back etc. etc.
As an Admin I am responsible for my actions. I dont take actions just because I can kick someone. If you are questioning my actions, thats fine.
I have no problems with that. I stand fully behind the action I took in this matter.
Rad wrote: Whether I will be mischievous, if I say:
Our simpatico and impassive admin boiled up and kicked that annoying player
![]()
P.S.
I played many times against /23SU/2/23CT3|). He is a good camper on his few favourite maps - usually wins on those maps, then picks another one of his favourites or else goes out of the server. Usually he is silent during the game and doesn't talk about anything. He comes to shoot, not to play - that is getting boring. 😕
I know he is a good camper and doesn't break the rules. I have no problems with his gameplay. It's as it should be.
It's the constant whining that is gonna bother me after a while.
The message I've sent him was very clear: If you don't like it on our server, search for another one that completely suits your needs.
You admit he /she is a good camper but was kicked for his/her whining? That is fucking sad. Thats all they said what what was in your post ❓ Thats it ❓ I think I have seen some member comments that were worse than whining about deemers. I dont like deemers on the server either. If I want to fly them I go to a deemer server. I know T likes them and this is his sandbox but I'm pretty sure you over stepped your boundries here.
3ison I appoligise it seems I have deleted your post now. Not on purpose.
I will end this discussion on my part. It is getting nowhere and isn't constructive at all.