Any new developements on this topic? ❓
wrote: TKK[GIZmo"]Any new developements on this topic? ❓
They stay...
Actually, the thread was never intended to get redeemers removed. What I was curious about was to see if there would be interest in duplicates of maps without deeemers, invisibility, health. Like they do in FN maps. Also was curious how many players objected to them and why.
mAmA

I dont care if they are in there or not, i use um if I want and leave them alone if i dont.
What i do not enjoy is when everyone runs for the deemer spot. So i think your idea, Mama, would be a nice way to appeal to people who do use um and those people who don't while making people camp. Esp in those maps that have one deemer, this would be a way to get rid of that spot as a possibility so that everyone aint just running for it.
as an add-on im tired of people complaining that they are being used. They are the server even if you dont want them there and the choice is not really anyone other then Tommy's to make.
btw i do enjoy the new mod more then the old one.
just to make sure yall understand me, when i say im tired of people complaining about or leaving the server i mean that i dont like it on the server. I dont care if you debate it on a place like the forum where i dont have to see it if i dont wanna.
I'll give my opionon on Deemers on a camping server if nobody mines, :).
I don't think they should be there. If someone kills you and you go running to there spot and kill them that be both revenge and assualt, yet your allowed to do it with a deemer and if someone is using a deemer and is in a corner somewhere and just keeps using them (essentially Hiding) and the only way to get them would be to assult them doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of a camping server where you are required to break the rules in order to stop someone killing you with deemer.
Anyway, there or not there I'll still come to your server and use your deemers when the occasion arises.
Ghost wrote: I'll give my opionon on Deemers on a camping server if nobody mines, :).
I don't think they should be there. If someone kills you and you go running to there spot and kill them that be both revenge and assualt, yet your allowed to do it with a deemer and if someone is using a deemer and is in a corner somewhere and just keeps using them (essentially Hiding) and the only way to get them would be to assult them doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of a camping server where you are required to break the rules in order to stop someone killing you with deemer.
Anyway, there or not there I'll still come to your server and use your deemers when the occasion arises.
I don't consider going after anyone using a redeemer, assault. Feel free to go get 'em.
I don't eiher.
The risk you take using a redeemer is you are vulnerable because you can only see through the deemer and not what's going on around you. I've shot my share of deemer pilots, been shot while flying them as well.
I'ts all good in my opinion.
mAmA

Good to see that one defined here.
Allways wondered about that.
Anytime you have a question about anything DOU, feel free to contact an admin, we will be happy to answer 😀 .
mAmA

{DOU} yO mAmA wrote: Anytime you have a question about anything DOU, feel free to contact an admin, we will be happy to answer 😀 .
mAmA
Or at least bullshit our way through it
😆
mAmA

Touch a Deemer at own risk! :tfrag:
"The buddy system is essential to your survival; it gives the enemy somebody else to shoot at!!"
What ever happened to the idea about adding a redeemer-less version of all current maps onto the map vote thing?
Otis_Firefly wrote: What ever happened to the idea about adding a redeemer-less version of all current maps onto the map vote thing?
The redeemer-less version is supposed to be for the FN list in the map vote. I plan to add that and update the list as soon as they finish deciding what maps will be in the ladder.
T



