Bender wrote: NO "E"
ok heres how to play
some1 will post a word and the next person has to put a word that starts with the last letter of the other persons word
for exp.
i would say fun
then the next poster would say
nothing
it can be any word that has the same first lestter as the last poster last letter but the word cannot contain an "e"
first word
lol ill use the word
Word.
Where in here does it say "English language? All I see for rules is the dark red ❓
*DARKMATTER* wrote: [quote={DOU}-=TALON=-][quote=".::/3I§ON]So why is not Cialis a word in the English language. Just because ita a name of a product?
Just like xina its a name of a person in a show or movie it's still a name and it's a name that is known. so xina should be good?
If you ment xena warrior princess then no its got an E in it so you would still lose
I was thinking that too but if u do a search for xina it does exist 😕
".::/3I§ON wrote: [quote=*DARKMATTER*][quote={DOU}-=TALON=-]
Just like xina its a name of a person in a show or movie it's still a name and it's a name that is known. so xina should be good?
If you ment xena warrior princess then no its got an E in it so you would still lose
I was thinking that too but if u do a search for xina it does exist 😕
Xina it dose exist i did a search on it.
{DOU}-=TALON=- wrote: [quote=".::/3I§ON][quote=*DARKMATTER*]
If you ment xena warrior princess then no its got an E in it so you would still lose
I was thinking that too but if u do a search for xina it does exist 😕
Xina it dose exist i did a search on it.
Yes, the name exists, but not the word.
T
If not a word then what is it?
name: 1. a word or phrase by which a person, thing or class is known.
The dictionary says a name is a word and since the aforementioned rules do not specifically exclude names I would have to conclude Xina, Yoda, Cialis and any others are legal.
to continue......
Satisfactory
Yugo
owned one once...lol
{DOU} Cygnus X-1 wrote: name: 1. a word or phrase by which a person, thing or class is known.
The dictionary says a name is a word and since the aforementioned rules do not specifically exclude names I would have to conclude Xina, Yoda, Cialis and any others are legal.
to continue......
Satisfactory
There we have it Xina is a good word.
{DOU}-=TALON=- wrote: [quote={DOU} Cygnus X-1]name: 1. a word or phrase by which a person, thing or class is known.
The dictionary says a name is a word and since the aforementioned rules do not specifically exclude names I would have to conclude Xina, Yoda, Cialis and any others are legal.
to continue......
Satisfactory
There we have it Xina is a good word.
We never said it was good 🙄
😛
{DOU}Charger wrote: Yugo
owned one once...lol
Owned a Yugo but named Charger :banghead:
{DOU}Charger wrote: Yugol
onyx
Xhosa
WORTH IT!
APOLOGY
{DOU} Cygnus X-1 wrote: name: 1. a word or phrase by which a person, thing or class is known.
The dictionary says a name is a word and since the aforementioned rules do not specifically exclude names I would have to conclude Xina, Yoda, Cialis and any others are legal.
to continue......
Satisfactory
What ❓ No rebuttal ❓
{DOU} Cygnus X-1 wrote: name: 1. a word or phrase by which a person, thing or class is known.
The dictionary says a name is a word and since the aforementioned rules do not specifically exclude names I would have to conclude Xina, Yoda, Cialis and any others are legal.
to continue......
Satisfactory
Well, seeing that you quoted a definition, I must be wrong. Oops, wait a minute, I guess you didn't actually read the definition that you posted.
"...by which a person, thing or class is known."
The key word above is "known." Most names are not known since they can apply to many different people or objects. Someone might have a dog named Rover. NASA sent a "Rover" to Mars. So if I say Rover, which is it? You might say it depends on the context to which it's placed. What if I just said "Rover?" On the other hand, if I say "watermellon," you know exactly what I am refering to. "But what about watermellon candy, he asks?" No such thing. There is however watermellon flavored candy. Whenever I use the "word" watermellon, you know exactly what I am speaking of. But if someone says the "name" Tommy, you cannot be 100% sure they are speaking of me. In context you can be reasonably sure if they are or aren't, but not 100% (unless they tell you directly). That is the difference between something being known and something being made known.
As I said before, just because someone opens their suck-hole and makes a sound, that doesn't automatically make it a word. Sometimes it is. Sometimes it is a name. Sometimes it is just a sound.
Tommy
P.S. I used Google to define "David.' It had definitons of the "name," but not the "word" (since it isn't one). The definitions are specific to individuals. I have a friend named David. He isn't defined nor do the definitions presented apply to him.
Latest Post: IRC How-To Our newest member: Wrotkaw Recent Posts Unread Posts
